Triple-rigorous Storytelling

A PI's Reflections on Devising Case Study Methods with Five Community-based Food Justice Organizations

Keywords: Case Studies, Food Dignity, Research Methods

Abstract

Case study research provides scholarly paths for storytelling, with systematic methodological guides for achieving epistemological rigor in telling true stories and deriving lessons from them. For docu­menting and better understanding work as complex as community organizing for food justice, rigorous storytelling may proffer one of the most suitable research methods. In a five-year action-research project called Food Dignity, leaders of five food justice community-based organizations (CBOs) and academics at four universities collaborated to develop case studies about the work of the five CBOs. In this reflective essay, the project’s principal investigator reviews methods used in other food justice case studies and outlines the case study methods used in Food Dignity. She also recounts lessons learned while developing these methods with collaborators. The community co-investigators show her that telling true stories with morals relating to justice work requires three kinds of methodological rigor: ethical, emotional, and epistemological.

Author Biography

Christine M. Porter, University of Wyoming

Associate Professor and Wyoming Excellence Chair of Community and Public Health; Food Dignity Principal Investigator; Division of Kinesiology & Health, College of Health Sciences

Published
2018-07-18
How to Cite
Porter, C. (2018). Triple-rigorous Storytelling. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, 8(A), 37-61. https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2018.08A.008
Section
Food Dignity Collaborative Action Research

Most read articles by the same author(s)