Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development http://foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj <p>The&nbsp;<strong><em>Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development</em><em>&nbsp;</em>(JAFSCD),</strong> ISSN 2152-0801, is an <strong>open access, international, peer-reviewed</strong> <strong>journal</strong> focused on the practice and applied research interests of agriculture and food systems development professionals. JAFSCD emphasizes best practices and tools related to the planning, community economic development, and ecological protection of local and regional agriculture and food systems, and works to bridge the interests of practitioners and academics. Articles are published online as they are approved, and are gathered into quarterly issues for indexing purposes. JAFSCD is an open access, online-only journal; all readers may download, share, or print any articles as long as proper attribution is given, in accordance with the Creative Commons <a title="CC BY 4.0" href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">CC BY 4.0</a> license.</p> en-US <p>The copyright to all content published in JAFSCD belongs to the author(s). It is licensed as <a title="Creative Commons BY 4.0 license" href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">CC BY 4.0</a>. This license determines how you may reprint, copy, distribute, or otherwise share JAFSCD content.</p> duncan@LysonCenter.org (Publisher and Editor in Chief: Duncan Hilchey) amy@LysonCenter.org (Managing Editor: Amy Christian) Wed, 13 Feb 2019 00:00:00 -0800 OJS 3.1.1.0 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 What Can Be: Stakeholder Perspectives for a Sustainable Food System http://foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj/article/view/683 <p>Any multistakeholder initiative that aims to build the basis for change in a food system, regardless of geographic scale, requires an understanding of what is important to stakeholders, how they view the boundaries of the system, and what changes they feel are needed. An assessment of stakeholder perspectives of the Phoenix Valley food system was conducted as an initial step in a process of food system coalition-building. The objectives of the research were to explore how active partici­pants in the food system visualized a “sustainable food system” and to juxtapose their perspectives on food system sustainability with those in the academic literature to create an initial picture of food sustainability. Respondents emphasized the importance of education, local food, reducing corporate power, and a strong desire to build a sense of community to better serve vulnerable communities. Nevertheless, the responses also revealed the difficulty of conceptualizing food system boundaries for intervention and the confla­tion of realist and idealist perspectives on what food systems are or could be. Stakeholders placed considerable weight on localism and the power of education and “demand constraint” on improving food system outcomes, while also attributing the root cause of Phoenix’s problems to broader-scale structural factors that were outside of their control or capacity to influence. This case study describes the potential utility of conducting such preliminary assessments in other cities, allowing stakeholders to reflect on their interests, agency, and capacities in the food system space prior to any efforts to build consensus and take collective action. We argue that this process is a crucial first step in any work on building alternative food systems, as it allows hidden areas of contestation (beliefs, values, goals) to arise. This enables participants to begin addres­sing differences and fostering trust, cooperation, and inclusiveness—thus ensuring the longevity of the coalition or group.</p> Jesus Garcia-Gonzalez, Hallie Eakin ##submission.copyrightStatement## http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 http://foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj/article/view/683 Fri, 22 Mar 2019 00:00:00 -0700 Net Yield Efficiency: Comparing Salad and Vegetable Waste between Community Supported Agriculture and Supermarkets in the UK http://foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj/article/view/684 <p>Food security is high on the global agenda. Two factors make it particularly pressing: the continuing rise in the global population, and the failure to adequately feed the current one. An area that has been the focus of much recent attention has been food waste; the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) estimates that as much as a third of all food is lost or wasted. This paper argues that by taking a food system approach that accounts for yields as well as loss and waste in distribution and consumption, we can compare the contribution of different food systems to food security. A novel concept of “net yield efficiency” (NYE) is introduced that accounts for this. We present an illustrative case study of the levels of fresh vegetable and salad waste in the supermarket-controlled food system compared with a commu­nity supported agriculture (CSA) scheme. This case study explores whether the CSA and its members are less wasteful than the supermarket system. The study found that when all stages of the food system were measured for waste, the CSA dramatically outperformed the supermarket system, wasting only 6.71% by weight compared to 40.7–47.7%. Even accounting for difficulties in estimating waste, the findings underline the differences between these systems. On this basis, the paper argues that the NYE measure provides a more accurate picture of food system performance than current measures, which tend to focus on yield alone.</p> Nigel Baker, Simon Popay, James Bennett, Moya Kneafsey ##submission.copyrightStatement## http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 http://foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj/article/view/684 Fri, 22 Mar 2019 00:00:00 -0700 Hidden in Plain Sight: Learning from Chinatown’s Produce Distribution System http://foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj/article/view/682 <p><em>First paragraph:</em></p> <p>New York’s Chinatown has a century-old produce distribution system that supplies the city with more than 200 types of extremely low-cost fresh fruits and vegetables that are sourced from hundreds of small- and midsize biodiverse farms and distributed to a network of vendors and restaurants. Yet this remarkable supply chain has been overshadowed by the gigantic Hunts Point terminal market and the distribution channels operated by the major supermarket chains. It is also overlooked by advocates of direct farm-to-consumer food retail. Valerie Imbruce’s <em>From Farm to Canal Street </em>unmasks this “alternative” food network, offering important lessons for policy­makers interested in increasing access to healthy, affordable, culturally appropriate food. . . .</p> Nevin Cohen ##submission.copyrightStatement## http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 http://foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj/article/view/682 Fri, 22 Mar 2019 00:00:00 -0700 The EarthBox Project in Grayson County, Virginia http://foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj/article/view/681 <p><em>First paragraph:</em></p> <p>In 2014, Kathy was contacted by Michelle Stamper, coordinator of the local Feeding America mobile pantry program in western Grayson County, Virginia. This pantry serves clients one Monday evening a month at a local school. Feeding America Southwest Virginia sends a truckload of food from Abingdon, Virginia, and volunteers assemble food boxes that are then placed directly in clients’ vehicles. Michelle had considered why the food pantry was needed, when rural Grayson County has such a rich agricultural history. When she reached out to Kathy, she asked if the nonprofit Kathy leads, Grayson LandCare, could help her teach pantry clients how to grow some of their own food. She said that many of them grew up with gardening, perhaps at their grandparents’ home, but very few gardened cur­rently and some may not even have known how to grow vegetables on their own. . . .</p> Kathy Cole, Liza Dobson ##submission.copyrightStatement## http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 http://foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj/article/view/681 Sat, 16 Mar 2019 00:00:00 -0700 Stakeholder Perceptions of the Impact of Cannabis Production on the Southern Oregon Food System http://foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj/article/view/679 <p>The passage of Measure 91 (Oregon Legalized Marijuana Initiative, 2014) in Oregon legalized the production of cannabis for recreational sale. Since legalization, there has been a significant increase in cannabis production across the agricultural land­scape of southern Oregon. Southern Oregon’s Rogue Valley now hosts 314 licensed recreational cannabis growers who share a changing agricultural landscape with orchards, vineyards, vegetable farms, seed industries, and ranches. The Rogue Valley Food System Network (RVFSN) convened focus groups across the region to explore the per­ceived impacts of the cannabis industry on the food system. These impacts were coded and cate­gorized for use in the development of future research questions. Stakeholders identified environ­mental impacts, land use policy, agricultural best practices, water resources, financial opportunities, resource competition, and a changing cultural landscape as areas in need of further research. This research brief informs work by lawmakers, land use planners, researchers, managers, and farmers in developing research, policies, and projects to address challenges and realize opportunities associated with the changing agricultural landscape in states where cannabis production is expanding.</p> Vincent M. Smith, Maud Powell, David Mungeam, Regan G. Emmons ##submission.copyrightStatement## http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 http://foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj/article/view/679 Tue, 12 Mar 2019 00:00:00 -0700 Investing in Local Food, Investing in Local Communities http://foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj/article/view/680 <p><em>First paragraphs:</em></p> <p><em>SOIL: Notes Toward the Theory and Practice of Nurture</em> is by Woody Tasch, the founder of the Slow Money Institute, which seeks to rebuild the economy from the ground up with an emphasis on sustainable local food systems. This book lays out Tasch’s vision for building local food systems.</p> <p>SOIL is an interesting and entertaining read. It is not a just-can’t-put-it-down read, but I think that is the point. Festooned with side notes, the text forces you to break up the read. In many cases, the notes not only tie into the text but also are teaser for the reader to go back and dig deeper. Tasch’s writing style is hard to define, but it has a very literary quality. The text is more a conversation than a formal dissertation. Tasch engages the reader, circling back and tying up his points to weave a plan of hope for the future. . . .</p> Thomas Bolles ##submission.copyrightStatement## http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 http://foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj/article/view/680 Tue, 12 Mar 2019 00:00:00 -0700 "Being Stewards of Land is Our Legacy": Exploring the Lived Experiences of Young Black Farmers http://foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj/article/view/678 <p>The oppressive histories of slavery, sharecropping, and discriminatory lending practices contribute to a modern American agricultural landscape where black farmers are underrepresented. While African Americans once made up 14% of the United States’ farmer population, today they only make up 1.4%. Moreover, the American farmer population overall is aging, and currently only 6% of farmers are under the age of 35. Despite these trends indi­cating decline, a small population of young black farmers is emerging. This qualitative case study aims to explore the experiences of this previously unexamined group of farmers. Participants found autonomy and self-sufficiency in agriculture, and a particular form of empowerment derived from reclaiming land and actively choosing to engage in work their ancestors were forced to do without pay. Findings from the study have implications for agricultural educators, extension professionals, and policy-makers working to cultivate a more diverse and representative body of American farmers.</p> Leslie Touzeau ##submission.copyrightStatement## http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 http://foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj/article/view/678 Sun, 10 Mar 2019 00:00:00 -0800 Establishing Sustainable Food Production Communities of Practice http://foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj/article/view/677 <p>This study describes the formation of nutrition gardening and pond fish farming communities of practice (CoPs) among small-scale farmers of the Malayalis tribe living in the Kolli Hills region of Tamil Nadu, India. We examine the factors that have shaped the formation of these CoPs, their purpose and function, who is involved, what activ­ities hold these communities together, and their role in strengthening sustainable food production and consumption practices. Data were obtained through participatory rural appraisals (PRAs), key stakeholder interviews, and participant observa­tions during four months of fieldwork. The pri­mary motivations that led the nutrition gardeners and pond fish farmers to become part of CoPs were to improve the health and nutrition of their families and to obtain expert advice in sustainable food production practices. Both CoPs are in the early stages of development and differ not only in the types of food they produce and the skills and tools needed for their success, but also in their structure; nutrition gardening takes place at the individual and/or household level, whereas pond fish farming operates at the group and/or commu­nity level. The ways in which members experience being in a community also differs. Nutrition gar­deners rely on open-ended conversations and community creation through relationship building; in contrast, fish farmers find that group meetings and maintaining transparent record-keeping are most important. Sustainability of these practices and the CoPs depended on factors internal to the communities (e.g., leadership, knowledge mobiliza­tion) as well as external factors (e.g., rainfall and market potential).</p> Suraya Hudson, Mary Beckie, Naomi Krogman, Gordon Gow ##submission.copyrightStatement## http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 http://foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj/article/view/677 Fri, 01 Mar 2019 00:00:00 -0800 Building Emancipatory Food Power: Freedom Farms, Rocky Acres and the Struggle for Food Justice http://foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj/article/view/675 <p>While scholars who study issues of food justice use the term food power rarely—if at all—their argu­ments often position the rise of the food justice movement in the context of food power that sus­tains oppression in the food system. Similarly, many food justice activists and organizations produce an analysis of oppressive forms of food power, while placing the goals of the movement to create sustainable community-based interventions in the periphery. Yet, the pursuit of food justice is a dual process related to power. This process is characterized by the simultaneous acts of disman­tling oppressive forms of food power and building emancipatory forms of food power. It also has deep roots in the historical arc of food politics in the Black Freedom Struggle of the civil rights era. However, we know very little about this dual pro­cess and how black communities engage in it. In this paper, I juxtapose two cases of black farm projects—the historical case of Freedom Farms Cooperative (FFC) in Mississippi and the contem­po­rary case of the Rocky Acres Community Farm (RACF) in New York—to explore the dual process of food justice. I conclude with a brief discussion on what the cases teach us about this dual process and its implications for scholars and activists who work on issues of food justice. Such implications provide insights into the possibilities of the food justice movement in the future and challenge the movement to include, more explicitly, issues of race, land, self-determination, and economic autonomy.</p> Bobby J. Smith, II ##submission.copyrightStatement## http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 http://foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj/article/view/675 Thu, 28 Feb 2019 00:00:00 -0800 Pairing a Q Study with Participatory Decision-making around Farmworker Safety http://foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj/article/view/676 <p>Tenets of participatory decision-making speak to the importance of meaningful participation from diverse stakeholders for improving both process and outcomes. But what participation actually looks like can vary substantially, and constructing a group where all actors can truly speak is often elusive. In addressing controversies over pesticide safety in tree fruit orchards in Washington State, we used a Q study to identify divergent viewpoints and convened a group to bring these views together. The resulting stakeholder working group was then challenged to both acknowledge their often-opposing viewpoints and to construct a mutually beneficial idea for improving pesticide safety in the tree fruit industry. This paper explores the dynamics of this stakeholder working group, analyzing not only its successes but also its challenges and difficulties. Rooted in a mainstream agricultural industry in the western United States, this study highlights the ways in which seemingly simple things like who “shows up” and why can shape processes and outcomes.</p> Nadine Lehrer, Colleen Donovan, Maureen Gullen ##submission.copyrightStatement## http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 http://foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj/article/view/676 Thu, 28 Feb 2019 00:00:00 -0800