@article{Ikerd_2022, place={Ithaca, NY, USA}, title={THE ECONOMIC PAMPHLETEER: Technology: Good, bad, or neutral?}, volume={11}, url={https://foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj/article/view/1048}, DOI={10.5304/jafscd.2022.112.001}, abstractNote={<p><em>First paragraphs:</em></p> <p>Is technology good, bad, or neutral? The pre­vailing sentiment seems to be that technology is neither good nor bad, but is simply a tool that can be used for either. However, once a technology has been developed, its net effects will be one or the other. The consequences will depend on the inten­tion, or perhaps inattention, with which a technol­ogy is developed and applied.</p> <p>The <em>Encyclopedia Britannica</em> (n.d.) defines technology as “the application of scientific knowledge to the practical aims of human life” (para. 1). The basic purpose of technology, whether mechanical, biological, or digital, is to allow people do things easier, faster, or better. Whether a technology is good, bad, or neutral depends on whose intentions or aims are met and who suffers any unintended consequences. The net effects of a technology, considering both good and bad, is determined not only by whether it contributes to the practical aims of some, but whether it contributes to the betterment of society or life in general. . . .</p>}, number={2}, journal={Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development}, author={Ikerd, John}, year={2022}, month={Jan.}, pages={5–8} }