TY - JOUR AU - Schreiber, Liana R. N. AU - Gold, Abby AU - Anfinson, Allison AU - Boelcke-Stennes, Kristen AU - Caspi, Caitlin AU - Chalise, Nishesh AU - Dahl, Michael AU - Hane, Amanda AU - Jenkins, Tim AU - Marczak, Mary AU - Nikodym, Ellen AU - Saunoi-Sangren, Emily AU - Shanfelt, Amy AU - Walhowe, Jared AU - Zukoski, Ann PY - 2019/07/22 Y2 - 2024/03/28 TI - Creating a Food System Report Card to Advance the Minnesota Food System JF - Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development JA - J. Agric. Food Syst. Community Dev. VL - 9 IS - A SE - PBFS Conference Snapshots DO - 10.5304/jafscd.2019.091.023 UR - https://foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj/article/view/712 SP - 241-242 AB - <p>The Minnesota Food Charter is a roadmap to improve access to healthy, affordable, and safe food. It proposes 99 specific strategies to guide statewide planning and action to change the food system. A report card to monitor the Minnesota food system is one component of this initiative, but there is a paucity of literature to guide its development. To bridge this gap, a shared measurement action team (SMAT) was created to recommend indicators that could be used to monitor the state of the Minnesota food system, as well as to advance place-based food systems that support unique communities statewide. SMAT established a cross-sector team, created team priorities, developed a theory of change, identified criteria to judge potential indicators, and proposed indicators to be monitored statewide. In this poster, researchers and practitioners can learn about the process of selecting indicators that support the creation of a sustainable, economic, ecological, and equitable food system, and the challenges that arose during these discussions. One challenge was that secondary data sources do not provide specific or sensitive enough data to disaggregate differing geographic levels or cultural/ethnic backgrounds. Despite the challenges, we recommended indicators for assessing food access, affordability, and availability; discussed limitations of these indicators; and are in the process of developing indicator recommendations for food system infrastructure. These indicators represent the current state of available secondary data and can be viewed as a springboard for conversation for both researchers and practitioners. They can also serve as a call to action to develop data systems that advance a place-based food system that supports health equity.</p> ER -