https://foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj/issue/feed Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development 2026-05-11T17:48:07+00:00 Publisher and Editor in Chief: Duncan Hilchey duncan@LysonCenter.org Open Journal Systems <p>The <strong><em>Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development</em><em> </em>(JAFSCD),</strong> ISSN 2152-0801, is published 4 times per year by the Thomas A. Lyson Center for Civic Agriculture and Food Systems, a project of the Center for Transformative Action, a nonprofit 501 c3 tax-exempt organization affiliated with Cornell University in Ithaca, New York.</p> <p>JAFSCD is an <strong>open access, international, peer-reviewed</strong> <strong>journal</strong> focused on the practice and applied research interests of agriculture and food systems development professionals. JAFSCD emphasizes best practices and tools related to the planning, community economic development, and ecological protection of local and regional agriculture and food systems, and works to bridge the interests of practitioners and academics. Articles are published online as they are approved, and are gathered into quarterly issues for indexing purposes. JAFSCD is an open access, online-only journal; all readers may download, share, or print any articles as long as proper attribution is given, in accordance with the Creative Commons <a title="CC BY 4.0" href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">CC BY 4.0</a> license.</p> https://foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj/article/view/1516 Improving nutrition in Massachusetts emergency food systems 2026-05-11T17:48:07+00:00 Bo Wang bo_wang@hsph.harvard.edu <p><strong>Introduction</strong></p> <p>Massachusetts faces a worsening food insecurity crisis: 37% of households were food insecure in 2024, up from 19% in 2019, with four regional food banks serving 882,000 people (Greater Boston Food Bank, 2025). Yet quantity alone does not ensure health. Food pantry clients consume diets high in processed foods, with Healthy Eating Index scores up to 20 points below national averages (Simmet et al., 2017), and face elevated rates of diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease (Eicher-Miller, 2020). Massachusetts bears over US$41.4 billion in annual chronic disease costs; preventing just 1% of new diabetes cases statewide would save an estimated US$66 million annually (American Diabetes Association, 2025; Massachusetts Department of Public Health, n.d.). . . .</p> 2026-05-11T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Bo Wang https://foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj/article/view/1514 Growing food and radical hope in Glasgow 2026-05-07T15:58:28+00:00 Rose Jennings rose.jennings@uri.edu <p><em>First paragraph:</em></p> <p>In the <em>Practice of Collective Escape: Politics, Justice and Community in Urban Growing Projects</em>, Helen Traill gives us a personal tour through the social com­plexities of community growing projects, accom­pa­nied by the rich insights of her ethnographic work over six years in Glasgow, Scotland. She follows two community growing sites during the Brexit transition and the COVID-19 pandemic. Her ana­lytical lens weaves the work of authors who have navigated topics of inclusion and exclusion in the Commons, negative and positive freedom, social justice and political activism, and the overall bene­fits and challenges of urban agriculture projects. The author illustrates her claims with illuminating stories and choice quotes from gardeners and the wider community connected to the case studies. Truly, reading this as a researcher who has spent both a fair amount of time with my hands in the soil in urban growing projects and behind the desk reading about them (studying public health benefits and governance challenges), Traill’s book stands apart as an illuminating examination of an infra­structure feature increasingly accepted as a net pos­itive in cities. Yet, these gardens are rarely critically looked at as Petri dishes for individual and com­munity transformation, which this book does through examining concepts of inclusion, individual escape, and political activism. . . .</p> 2026-05-07T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Rose Jennings https://foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj/article/view/1513 Atsalugpiaq awareness: Food agency of cloudberry subsistence to support Indigenous food sovereignty 2026-05-04T22:24:29+00:00 Claire Friedrichsen Claire.friedrichsen@usda.gov Lynn Marie Church lchurch@nalaquq.com Jacqueline Cleveland jcleveland.nvk@gmail.com Sean Gleason sgleason@nalaquq.com Sire Kassama sire.kassama@usda.gov Mary Church nalaquq.coauthors@gmail.com Willard Church nalaquq.coauthors@gmail.com Frank Mathew nalaquq.coauthors@gmail.com Miles Bavilla nalaquq.coauthors@gmail.com Grace Hill nalaquq.coauthors@gmail.com Eleanor Merrit nalaquq.coauthors@gmail.com Warren Jones wjones.qinc@gmail.com Grace Hunter nalaquq.coauthors@gmail.com Lucille Mark nalaquq.coauthors@gmail.com Jonathon Hunter nalaquq.coauthors@gmail.com Dorothy Mark nalaquq.coauthors@gmail.com Margaret Roberts nalaquq.coauthors@gmail.com Mathew Roberts nalaquq.coauthors@gmail.com Catherine Beebee nalaquq.coauthors@gmail.com Jonathon Mark nalaquq.coauthors@gmail.com <p>This study examines food agency of <em>atsalugpiaq</em> sub­sistence practices in the Indigenous community of Kuinerraq, Alaska. Food agency is the capacity of individuals or communities to define and achieve food and diet-related goals. While past research lit­erature has limited the theoretical scope of food agency to cooking and consumption, this study expands the concept to encompass pro­visioning, addressing a theoretical gap in the literature. Through participatory co-developed research led by Nalaquq LLC, oral histories with Alaska Native community members identify new components of food agency: ethics, science and knowledge, and autonomy. These findings build upon and extend the existing framework of food agency that empha­sizes individual skills, attitudes, and structural barri­ers, and offers a more holistic understanding of the drivers of food security in rural and Indigenous communities. Kuinerraq is committed to carrying forward <em>yuugnagpiallerput</em> (living a proper Yup’ik life) in response to environmental and social change to ensure their future generations’ prosperity. The study highlights that efforts to build food security must center on supporting cultural enrichment, relational values, and lived practices rather than relying solely on externally imposed metrics and theoretical concepts.&nbsp;</p> 2026-05-04T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Claire N. Friedrichsen, Lynn Marie Church, Jacqueline Cleveland, Sean Gleason, Sire Kassama, Mary Church, Willard Church, Frank Mathew, Miles Bavilla, Grace Hill, Eleanor Merrit, Warren Jones, Grace Hunter, Lucille Mark, Jonathon Hunter, Dorothy Mark, Margaret Roberts, Mathew Roberts, Catherine Beebee, Jonathon Mark https://foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj/article/view/1512 “It’s not just about groceries”: Understanding perspectives on a planned food co-op in West Charlotte, North Carolina 2026-05-01T02:11:38+00:00 Michelle Zuñiga mzuniga@charlotte.edu Mohsin Raza mraza3@charlotte.edu Tara Bengle tara@terradaticonsulting.com Colleen Hammelman colleen.hammelman@charlotte.edu Elliott Royal elliott@westblvdnc.org <p>Food insecurity is a serious issue in the U.S., partic­ularly in communities that have experienced long-standing disinvestment and racial segregation. In historically Black neighborhoods in West Charlotte, North Carolina, supermarket redlining and urban neglect have contributed to limited access to affordable, healthy, and culturally relevant foods. In response, the West Boulevard Neighborhood Coalition (WBNC), a local nonprofit, developed the Three Sisters Market, a planned community-owned food cooperative (co-op) designed to address food insecurity, promote economic devel­opment, and serve as a community gathering space for West Charlotte residents. While community-owned food co-ops present a promising solution by expanding access to affordable food options in areas where no grocery store has been sited, there is a significant gap in research documenting resi­dent perspectives on co-ops, particularly those planned in historically marginalized Black commu­nities. To address the gap, this study used a com­munity-engaged research approach in partnership with WBNC to explore local perspectives on the planned West Charlotte co-op. It aimed to answer the questions: (1) How do residents perceive com­munity food co-ops; (2) What are the perceived benefits and challenges of a co-op in West Charlotte; (3) What services, attributes, and ameni­ties do residents consider important for the success of the planned co-op. We conducted 34 semi-structured interviews with West Charlotte residents and local workers, and individuals from surround­ing areas. Thematic analysis revealed both opportu­nities and concerns, that most participants were unfamiliar with food co-ops but would “very likely” shop there after learning more. Participants prioritized fresh produce, culturally relevant foods, and ready-to-eat healthy meals. They also envi­sioned the co-op as a hub for cooking classes, health education, and social connection in general. Concerns about the co-op’s ability to sustain itself financially, affordability, and transportation access underscored the importance of inclusive planning and engagement. This study contributes to food justice and co-op development literature by center­ing resident voices and offering practical insights for community-driven food access solutions in historically marginalized communities.</p> 2026-05-01T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Michelle E. Zuñiga, Mohsin Raza, Tara Bengle, Colleen Hammelman, Elliott Royal https://foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj/article/view/1511 THE ECONOMIC PAMPHLETEER: The need for radical changes in community development policies 2026-05-01T02:04:28+00:00 John Ikerd jeikerd@gmail.com <p><em>First paragraphs:</em></p> <p>This is the final installment in a series of Economic Pamphleteer columns advocating radical changes in government policies. Previous columns have made the case for changing policies that affect farming and food production. This column focuses on additional policy changes needed to revitalize communities—both rural and urban. When I began writing this series, it seemed as if the current political turmoil had created an opportunity for changes that would not have been possible earlier. With growing cultural division and social dissent, it appears we are nearing a time when radical changes in government policies will no longer be optional but necessary. Anything less may be too little, too late.</p> <p>I concluded my previous columns with policy proposals to empower people to create more sustainable agri-food systems locally, within their communities. People in like-minded food com­munities could then form networks to create bio­regional, national, and global sustainable food systems. Over the years, I have become convinced that community-based food networks are the key to creating sustainable food systems. I believe the same is true for economies and societies. Authentic sustainability begins with committed individuals but grows within and among caring communities. Government policies can not create sustainable communities, but radical changes in community development policies could replace current obstacles with opportunities. . . .</p> 2026-05-01T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 John Ikerd https://foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj/article/view/1510 IN THIS ISSUE: Righting systemic food and farming inequalities 2026-04-08T02:18:43+00:00 Duncan Hilchey duncan@lysoncenter.org <p><em>First paragraph:</em></p> <p>The spring 2026 issue of the <em>Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development</em> brings together a set of contributions that, while they are open-call and not in response to a specific call for papers, col­lectively examine how food systems are governed, how access and equity are structured, how agroecological transitions unfold, and how knowledge systems and cultural values shape transformation. Across its entire content, the issue reflects a strong throughline of systems thinking, place-based analysis, and an expanding recognition of the wide range of ways of knowing and acting within food systems. . . .</p> 2026-04-08T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Duncan Hilchey https://foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj/article/view/1509 From geographical indication protection to food sovereignty 2026-04-07T17:48:30+00:00 Segnide Guidimadjegbe guidimas@oregonstate.edu Laurence Becker laurence.becker@oregonstate.edu <p>Local food is the consequence of a combination of cultural and physical environment conditions. The distinctive qualities of sub-Saharan African local food are threatened by national agricultural policies that emphasize export crops. Protecting local food offers a path to food sovereignty for rural commu­nities. Geographical indication (GI) labeling pro­tects distinctive local food. This case study exam­ines Gari Sohoui, a processed form of cassava, originating from Savalou District (or Commune) in central Benin. Based on fieldwork, the study explores to what extent GI protected Gari Sohoui can foster local communities’ food sovereignty. The primary actors involved in this food system, farmers and processors, were surveyed through in-depth, semi-structured individual interviews and participant observations. Interviews revealed that labor constraints for weeding present the most important challenges to production. In the absence of practical agroecological alternatives to manage weeds, growers use herbicides that are widely accessible because of the country’s agricultural development strategy. While GI protection of Gari Sohoui in central Benin promises to foster social cohesion, generate substantial economic gains, and promote transition to agroecological practices, the widespread use of herbicides in the case study villages threatens to undermine the status of Gari Sohoui. GI protection for Gari Sohoui empowers local communities to take control of their food systems, especially women, through preservation and valorization of local knowledge while contributing to their food sovereignty.</p> 2026-04-07T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Segnide J. Guidimadjegbe, Laurence Becker https://foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj/article/view/1508 VALUE CHAIN COORDINATION COLUMN: Turning supply chains into value chains 2026-04-07T17:26:22+00:00 Anaya Hall Anaya.Hall@uky.edu Laura Edwards-Orr Laura.Edwards-Orr@usda.gov Andrew Carberry andrew.carberry@winrock.org Eric De Luca eric@leveragepoint.solutions <p>JAFSCD is delighted to share this inaugural column on the topic of value chain coordination. We define VCC as the development of relational infrastructure—networks, information channels, and partnerships—that support thriving and sustainable regional food economies. JAFSCD also announces a new series of program, policy, and practice briefs focused on value chain coordination This series aims to synthesize the current knowledge on coordinating values-based food supply chains into concise, high-impact, practitioner-focused briefs. The series and associated articles are being curated by a JAFSCD Value Chain Coordination Editorial Circle made up of the scholars and practitioners below, who will also jointly produce this quarterly column.</p> <ul> <li>Kathryn Barr, Associate, SupplyChange</li> <li>Patrick Baur, Associate Professor, University of Rhode Island</li> <li>Analena Bruce, Assistant Professor, University of New Hampshire</li> <li>Andrew Carberry, Project Manager, Wallace Center at Winrock International</li> <li>Eric DeLuca, Consultant, Food Finance Institute</li> <li>Laura Edwards-Orr, Senior Agricultural Marketing Specialist, USDA Agricultural Marketing Service, Local and Regional Food Division</li> <li>Anaya Hall, Postdoctoral Scholar, The Food Connection at the University of Kentucky</li> <li>Heather (“H”) Nieto-Friga, CEO, SupplyChange</li> <li>Ashton Potter, Executive Director, The Food Connection at the University of Kentucky</li> <li>Elliott Smith, Consultant, Kitchen Sync Strategies</li> <li>Jodee Smith, Executive Director, FARMWISE Indiana</li> <li>Ye Su, Assistant Professor, Lincoln University of Missouri</li> <li>Dawn Thilmany, Professor, Colorado State University</li> <li>Kamran Zendehdel, Research Branch Chief, USDA Agricultural Marketing Service, Local and Regional Food Division</li> </ul> <p>* * *</p> <p>At a moment when food systems stakeholders are navigating supply chain disruption, market consolidation, and increasing climate-driven risk, questions of how best to retain or expand benefits for small and midsize farms and food businesses are increasingly urgent. Across various geographies and markets, value chain coordination (VCC) has emerged as a critical lever for addressing these challenges. In this inaugural column, we introduce VCC—a concept that bridges many concerns of JAFSCD readers—and suggest a few topics the series may address. We also provide some context on the first brief, which focuses on how VCC offers a pathway to address challenges associated with institutional purchasing and harness this strategic opportunity to support regional and sustain­able food producers.</p> 2026-04-07T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Anaya L. Hall, Laura Edwards-Orr, Andrew Carberry, Eric De Luca https://foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj/article/view/1507 Impact of conflict on Lebanon’s food industry 2026-04-03T20:51:26+00:00 Aline Issa aissa@ndu.edu.lb Samar Merhi smerhi@ndu.edu.lb Jessy El Hayek Fares jelhayek@ndu.edu.lb Elie Bou Yazbeck ebouyazbeck@economy.gov.lb Marc Bou Zeidan mbouzeidan@ndu.edu.lb <p>Against the backdrop of compounded crises, economic collapse, COVID-19, and violent conflict, Lebanon’s food system has become increasingly vulnerable. This study examines war’s impact on Lebanon’s agri-food small and medium enterprises (SMEs), the backbone of its food industry and economic resilience. This study evaluates the impact of war on operational aspects and identifies key recovery priorities by employing a quantitative survey of members of the QOOT cluster, Lebanon’s leading agri-food business network. The results show widespread disruption, with significant challenges in financial performance and market access. Other major concerns include supply chain disruptions, workforce issues, and infrastructure damage. Key business needs identified include emergency financial assistance, alternative market and supplier connections, enhanced workforce safety, and infrastructural support. The findings reveal vulnerability in Lebanon’s agricultural sector due to geopolitical shocks and the urgent need for emergency responses focusing on resilience, diversification, workforce protection, and infrastructure. This research guides humanitarian and development efforts to safeguard food security and economic sustainability.</p> 2026-04-03T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Aline Issa, Samar Merhi, Jessy El Hayek Fares, Elie Bou Yazbeck, Marc Bou Zeidan https://foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj/article/view/1506 Virginia independent food retailer perceptions of their role in planetary health promotion 2026-04-03T20:22:40+00:00 Maria DeNunzio mdenunzio8@vt.edu Bailey Houghtaling bhoughtaling@centerfornutrition.org Victor Olayemi victoro@vt.edu Elena Serrano serrano@vt.edu Maaz Gardezi maaz@vt.edu Vivica Kraak vivica51@vt.edu Sam Hedges sam@virginiafreshmatch.org Sarah Misyak smisyak@vt.edu <p>Healthy food retail initiatives have been common approaches to promote nutrition security in the U.S.; however, they have under-emphasized planetary health promotion, despite the close connections of healthy earth systems to ensuring nutrition security. The purpose of this study was to explore the perceptions of independent food retail owners and managers about their role in planetary health promotion, identify potential planetary health promotion practices, and describe barriers and facilita tors to implementation. Twelve semi-structured interviews, informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) 2.0, were conducted with independent groceries, cooperatives, and on-farm store members of Virginia Fresh Match, a statewide fruit and vegetable incentive food retailer network. Descriptive inductive codes and <em>a priori</em> barrier and facilitator codes from CFIR constructs were used by two independent coders to describe and categorize the data. Results showed that retailers had a range of interest in planetary health promotion, with cooperatives including planetary health in all business decisions, farm stores primarily focusing on agricultural practices, and grocers most interested in those practices that aligned with profit potential and customer expectations. Among all retailers, amenability to planetary health practices varied by community context. Planetary health practices included: agricultural practices of suppliers, bulk offerings, energy usage, food miles, local foods, animal source protein reduction, and waste reduction. Profit potential and alignment with customer expectations were the most important consideration for retailers to implement any planetary health practice and were barriers and facilitators depending on practice and community context. Partnerships and other external supports were identified as facilitators for planetary health promotion. The results can inform future research that investigates differences in retailer-preferred practices across contexts, explorations of how to frame planetary health messages to align with customer expectations, and tailoring of implementation strategies.</p> 2026-04-03T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Maria DeNunzio, Bailey Houghtaling, Victor Olayemi, Elena Serrano, Maaz Gardezi, Vivica Kraak, Sam Hedges, Sarah Misyak