The myth of “feeding the world”

Subsidizing agricultural overproduction and industrial technologies, and marginalizing alternatives

Authors

  • Philip H. Howard Michigan State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2023.123.008

Keywords:

Population Growth, Industrial Agriculture, Malthus, Green Revolution, Alternatives

Abstract

First paragraph:

How many times have you heard some version of the phrase “we need to produce more food to feed a growing population”—often attached to impressively precise estimates of the percentage increases and specific dates far into the future?

If you’re reading this journal, it’s probably in the thousands, if not more. In this book, Glenn Davis Stone dismantles such claims and shows who is really benefiting from their constant repe­tition (hint: it’s not most of us). He suggests a description of a problem that should be widely repeated instead: overproduction due to massive government subsidies—particularly for input industries—is leading to the runaway industriali­zation of agriculture and its numerous negative impacts. . . .

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Philip H. Howard, Michigan State University

Professor of Community Sustainability; member of the Inter­national Panel of Experts on Sustainable Food Systems (IPES-Food)

Cover of "The Agricultural Dilemma"

Published

2023-05-01

How to Cite

Howard, P. (2023). The myth of “feeding the world”: Subsidizing agricultural overproduction and industrial technologies, and marginalizing alternatives. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, 12(3), 259–260. https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2023.123.008