Northeastern bakers' views on organic and regeneratively certified flours
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2023.131.018
Keywords:
conventional flour, organic flour, local agriculture, regional grain, regenerative organic certificationAbstract
There is a continued interest in reviving small and midsize grain mills that allow for more differentiated flour offerings, including mills with environmental benefits. This study seeks to assess Northeastern bakers’ and distributors’ views on U.S. Department of Agriculture–certified organic flour and potential demand for flour with the Regenerative Organic certification by conducting a survey of bakers and distributors. Results provide evidence that, for multiple reasons, many bakers use both conventional and certified organic flours despite the fact that they cannot call the final product organic and, if budgets allowed, would increase organic flour purchases. Bakers and distributors believe customers do not understand the importance of the organic certification, that customers need to be educated on the Regenerative Organic Certified label, and that bakers would switch to flour with a Regenerative Organic certification if quality and price were comparable to organic.
Metrics
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Karen Hiniker Simons
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The copyright to all content published in JAFSCD belongs to the author(s). It is licensed as CC BY 4.0. This license determines how you may reprint, copy, distribute, or otherwise share JAFSCD content.