SNAP’s Restaurant Meals Program
Understanding drivers and constraints on state adoption and implementation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2026.152.013
Keywords:
SNAP, Restaurant Meals Program, food policy, nutrition program, food accessAbstract
The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), the largest U.S. nutrition assistance program, provides financial support to Americans with low income to purchase food. However, SNAP benefits cannot be used to purchase prepared foods, including foods at restaurants. The Restaurant Meals Program (RMP), a program under SNAP offices, offers an important opportunity, yet an underutilized strategy, to improve food access and food security for some of the most vulnerable individuals, including older adults, people experiencing homelessness, and those with disabilities, by allowing them to use SNAP benefits to purchase food at participating restaurants. Though introduced as an option for states in 1977, uptake of RMP has been low, with only nine states participating as of 2025. The factors driving or hindering RMP adoption and effective implementation are poorly understood, leaving a critical gap in policy and practice. To fill these knowledge gaps, this study utilized a rapid literature review, followed by key informant interviews with state administrators of RMP and owners of independent restaurants participating in RMP. Key drivers for adoption and implementation of RMP included motivations to champion food access and food security; to connect local restaurants, communities, and cultures; and to stimulate local economies. Conversely, major constraints included onerous administrative processes for both states and restaurants; fast-food chain domination undermining the driver of connecting local restaurants, communities, and cultures; overcoming misconceptions and negative public opinions about the program; and addressing gaps in program evaluation efforts. These findings highlight the multi-level nature of factors, ranging from intrapersonal motivations to broader policy and administrative domains, that require attention for the successful and equitable expansion of RMP, and highlight RMP as an opportunity to promote agency, dignity, and equity in food assistance, particularly for vulnerable groups least able to prepare meals at home. Recommendations include streamlining enrollment, prioritizing independent restaurant participation, improving federal guidance, and investing in program evaluation.
Metrics
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Vicky Vong, Cerra C. Antonacci, Audrey E. Thomas,, Lisa Poirier, Megan P. Mueller, Julia A. Wolfson, Yeeli Mui

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The copyright to all content published in JAFSCD belongs to the author(s). It is licensed as CC BY 4.0. This license determines how you may reprint, copy, distribute, or otherwise share JAFSCD content.






