THE ECONOMIC PAMPHLETEER: Technology: Good, bad, or neutral?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2022.112.001
Keywords:
Technology, Sustainability, Sustainable Intensification, LaborAbstract
First paragraphs:
Is technology good, bad, or neutral? The prevailing sentiment seems to be that technology is neither good nor bad, but is simply a tool that can be used for either. However, once a technology has been developed, its net effects will be one or the other. The consequences will depend on the intention, or perhaps inattention, with which a technology is developed and applied.
The Encyclopedia Britannica (n.d.) defines technology as “the application of scientific knowledge to the practical aims of human life” (para. 1). The basic purpose of technology, whether mechanical, biological, or digital, is to allow people do things easier, faster, or better. Whether a technology is good, bad, or neutral depends on whose intentions or aims are met and who suffers any unintended consequences. The net effects of a technology, considering both good and bad, is determined not only by whether it contributes to the practical aims of some, but whether it contributes to the betterment of society or life in general. . . .
Metrics
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2022 John Ikerd
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The copyright to all content published in JAFSCD belongs to the author(s). It is licensed as CC BY 4.0. This license determines how you may reprint, copy, distribute, or otherwise share JAFSCD content.