THE ECONOMIC PAMPHLETEER: Government regulation: Too much or too little
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2024.141.001
Keywords:
food systems, government regulation, small-scale producers, industrial producers, riskAbstract
First paragraphs:
On June 28, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed a 40-year-old Court decision that had made it easier for the federal government to enforce regulations that protect the environment, public health, workers, and consumers from economic exploitation. The six-to-three majority ruling was widely considered a victory for corporate and conservative political interests that have worked for decades to weaken government regulations.
The case has been called “the conservative-dominated court’s clearest and boldest repudiation yet of what critics of regulation call the administrative state” (Sherman, 2024a, para. 3). The same justices, by the same majority, stripped the Securities and Exchange Commission of its primary means of fighting fraud by requiring jury trials for accused violators of SEC rules (Sherman, 2024b). In other words, the current Supreme Court has demonstrated a commitment to weakening the government’s ability to write and enforce rules and regulations. . . .
Metrics
![Portrait of John Ikerd](https://foodsystemsjournal.org/public/journals/1/submission_1298_1335_coverImage_en_US.jpg)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 John Ikerd
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The copyright to all content published in JAFSCD belongs to the author(s). It is licensed as CC BY 4.0. This license determines how you may reprint, copy, distribute, or otherwise share JAFSCD content.